Good point and I do agree with you. Perhaps we should postpone any moving of code around unless we can come up with a good story for the users.
Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 22:10 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] ArrayUtils monster file > > We should think about this from the client's perspective. Clients > generally don't care how big the underlying implementation is. What > they care about is having a meaningful API to call. If we start > changing the client API simply because we think the implementation is > getting too big, well, then I think we have bigger problems... ;-) > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:20:07 -0400, Gary Gregory > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > ArrayUtils is currently a 3800+ line monster file. I am working on > > adding "add" and "addAll" methods for 2.1 and am wondering what folks > > would think of a separate class for these ops: ArrayAddUtils? > > AddArrayUtils? > > > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
