On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:45:45 +0100 (BST), Stephen Colebourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) This change should only be supported if it moves
> methods not yet released.
>
> 2) The new utils class must have a clear scope, which
> will give it a clear name.
>
> 3) Size is not the first factor, API is.
>
> In this case, the intent of the
> add/addAll/remove/indexOf methods is to make an array
> look and behave like a list, hence ArrayAsListUtils.
How about making it an adapter class?
public class ArrayListAdapter implements List {
private static class IntArrayAdapter {}
...
public ArrayListAdapter (Object[] array) {}
public ArrayListAdapter (int[] array) {}
public ArrayListAdapter (double[] array) {}
public ArrayListAdapter (boolean[] array) {}
public Object[] getArray () { ... }
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
