I would recommend submitting a patch to the java files into bugzilla
with the changes in it.
Review the contributing documentation on the developers page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/math/developers.html
Post any questions you may have about contributing a patch.
Cheers,
-Mark
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
I agree entirely with your argument. I would feel more comfortable
with 0 to n-1.
Ok, how do I update the inproved class, as I did that already
yesterday evening. I would also like to add several new methods:
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int startRow, int endRow, int startColumn,
int endColumn) throws MatrixIndexException;
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int[] rows, int[] columns) throws
MatrixIndexException;
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int startRow, int endRow, int[] columns)
throws MatrixIndexException;
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int[] rows, int startColumn, int endColumn)
throws MatrixIndexException;
RealMatrix getRowMatrix(int row) throws MatrixIndexException;
RealMatrix getColumnMatrix(int col) throws MatrixIndexException;
double[] columnMeans();
double[] rowMeans();
getRowMatrix and getColumnMatrix could be excluded as they are special
cases of the getSubMatrix methods.
Objections against these?
Cheers,
Kim
--
Mark R. Diggory
Software Developer
Harvard MIT Data Center
http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
