--- Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brent Worden wrote: > > Ok, > > > > I tally (pre-apologies if I misrepresent anyone): > > > > Four votes for 0-based indexing (Andrew, Kim, Mark, and Stephen). > > Three votes for 1-based indexing (Al, Phil, and myself). > > > > Should we go ahead with the 0-based change and put this to rest? Or do we > > still need some debate? > > > > I, for one, want to move on. > > +1 for moving on :-) > > Interesting that "astonishment is in the eye of the beholder." > > Mathematicians may be astonished by the 0-based indexing; but as long as > it is clearly documented, most will not care. I am assuming from the > above that you, Brent, are OK with the change. That leaves only me and Al > as holdouts. I can live with it, and Al seems ambivalent, so I will go > ahead and make the change. Assuming you are OK with this, Al?
Yes, go ahead. We'll let our users tell us whether we made the right decision here. Al --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
