Could be, but if it already works (with SAX I guess) and it is maintainable there is not need for a change. xmlio just makes SAX so much easier and convernient to use.
Oliver On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:08:05 -0400, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > > I understand your fears. > > > However, xmlio is not a mapper to Java objects, you just > > receiver augmented SAX call backs. > > Is this something that could be pitched to Digester and XMLBeans to use > under the covers? What would be the pros/cons of their adopting this > package rather than their current code? > > --- Noel > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
