Now that Robert changed his vote to +1 and there were no objections to my scope proposal and three days of voting have passed I understand the vote is now over and has passed with the following binding votes:
- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 - Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 - Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 - robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 As I am not a Commons committer, yet, I have no idea if I am entitled to announce the result of this vote and how to go on from here. I guess at least the initial committers will need commons CVS karma: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anything else I will have to ask for? Anything else I should do *now*? Thanks for support, Oliver On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:43:10 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > as described in previous posts and inspired by the fine proposal for > email promotion I would like to see the transaction component > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/ > > promoted to commons proper. > > The initial committers would be Stefan L�tzkendorf, James Mason, > Daniel Florey and me. AFAIK none of us is a committer in commons > proper so the promotion would include making as committers there. > > We all are Jakarta Slide committers and this is where the component > came from. We factored out code for a transactional file system, > transactional maps (implementing Map interface) with different ACID > strategies, general purpose locks and a few more helper classes. > > Junit tests exist for all parts and succeed: > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/junit-report.html > > Javadoc is pretty complete > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/apidocs/index.html > > and general documentation and even a short tutorial for locks exist: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/locks/tutorial.html > > The transaction component is stable enough to be released as a 1.0 > soon after promotion and would initially be maintained by the > committers of the Slide community. Once promoted growth is anticipated > as even in the sandbox it attracted some attention. > > As I am not a commons committer, I have no binding vote, but my > non-binding vote of course is +1. > > Oliver > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
