I'm +1 on the backward compatibility.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:48:52 +1100, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > The patch in r148883 is causing me hassles: I'm getting "[]" (an empty > list converted to string) when I was expecting "". > > I don't really grok this, so I'm not sure how it is used enough to debug > it. I'm actually getting the [] back from x:expr (on an attribute in > JSL) and haven't located the x:set that does it, but basically its not > backwards compatible as is. > > Any chance we can roll this back for the moment until something > backwards compat. can be developed? > > Cheers, > Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
