Dirk, from what I can see feedparser seems more like a top level java project than a commons one. Maybe it should go straight from the sandbox to jakarta?
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:21:42 +0100, Dirk Verbeeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for promoting feedparser to commons proper > > -0 for dedicated mailing list, httpclient got one during their major > refactoring mail storm when they were sending dozens of mails every > day. It was a practical solution but not good community wise. > I would advice only to get a separate mailing list if you are planning > to move to jakarta level project. (it is also less confusing to your > users) > > -- Dirk > > > Kevin A. Burton wrote: > > Subject: > > > > Hey gang. > > > > I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main > > personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my > > CodeCon > > talk on the FeedParser on Feb 11. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/feedparser/ > > > > We've been in the sandbox for 11 months now. The FeedParser itself is > > more than > > 2 years old. Its currently used in production at rojo.com to handle > > more than > > 1.9 million feeds. > > > > We currently have three developers working on the FeedParser: > > > > Kevin Burton (me) > > Brad Neuberg (Rojo Networks Inc.) > > Joseph Ottinger (Fusion Alliance) > > > > We're also working with the Rome developers (another RSS parser) to try to > > standardize APIs and are collaborating on a common feed parsing components > > including networking IO, autodiscovery, unit test, and potential > > collaboration. > > In order for this to happen though I need to get a stable release of > > FeedParser > > out the door and the sandbox doesn't allow any releases. > > > > I also want to be able to give out SVN commit to additional developers > > as they > > come on board. > > > > Also... I assume we can get a dedicated mailing list for the FeedParser? > > HttpClient is currently doing this. > > > > The roadmap for FeedParser is to get a 0.5 release out before Feb 11 and > > then > > about a month later to release 1.0. Then I want to start working on > > better and > > DEEPER unit tests and then rewrite the backend to use SAX. At this > > point I > > can make a better case that the Rome developers should build their > > object model > > on top of FeedParser .... > > > > Thanks guys!!! > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
