On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 20:56 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote: > --- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd be happy with including this approach in the > > next release, removing > > the redundant isXYZAvailable methods and calling the > > next release 1.1. > > In practice, I'm sure no-one *does* subclass > > LogFactoryImpl so there's > > no problem. In fact I'd be happier with this than a > > 1.0.5 where the > > methods exist but don't do anything. > > > > +1 Ok. So questions: * Robert are you ok with adopting Brian's approach to checking a logger is ok (by creating one) rather than using the current isXYZAvailable? * Robert, are you ok with ripping out the isXYZAvailable methods and calling the next release 1.1? * Brian: if Robert's ok with this (and no-one else votes -1), will you prepare an actual patch or should I? By the way, Brian, are you an Apache committer? Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
