On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 16:42 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:22 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is a flaw (maybe the child really > > wanted jdk logging, and we're giving them log4j), but > > basically we're discovering the log method made > > available via the TCCL. > > I think that if log4j *can* be used, and we find it, then that is right. > Autodiscovery is meant to find log4j before jdk14.
+1 > And I'm not too bothered by discovering the "wrong" logging > implementation anyway; users can always use a commons-logging.properties > or a META-INF/services file to specify which logging lib they want if > they really care. > > What's important is that the discovered logging lib *works* (doesn't > throw an exception). +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
