On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 16:49 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > PS: > > Robert, you didn't reply on whether you agree with removing the > isXXXAvailable methods or not. Please see second paragraph of comment > #12, and Brian's response in comment#13: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661
i did post quite an involved reply (but it was easy to miss). it boiled down to: i agree with all your reasoning but think that breaking binary compatibility will make *so* many problems for *so* many users that it's better to leave the methods in. if we break semantic compatibility we definitely need to push the version to 1.1. we also need to add something strong in the release notes and in the announcement. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
