Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would rather aim directly toward a 1.2 release including the latest
>> enhancements, that sounds easier than managing a 1.1.x branch and a
>> 1.2.x branch given our limited resources. What fixes would you merge in
>> a 1.1.x branch ?
>>
[...]
>My intention was to get out a release soon to make the fixes after the
>1.1 release available to a larger user base. Because there are only few
>new features the version number 1.1.1 seemed to be appropriate.
>If you want to directly go to 1.2, what other changes would you like to
>incorporate? Or in other words: when could a 1.2 release happen?
[ ] can replace 1.1 without any user or developer visible changes: 1.1.1
[ ] might have some developers "gotchas" or user visible changes: 1.2
IMHO.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
