On 10/24/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unless some one beats me to it, once the patch is available i'll add
> myself to the dev list and review (as time permits).

Patches submitted.

> > While I'm at it would it be desirable to transition to the privately
> > head lock idiom
> it might (however) stop a user doing something equivalent through
> carelessness or naivity. so probably worth doing. would need to add a
> note to the documentation since this would change the semantics.
> opinions?

I have a number of pending patches: http://tinyurl.com/cauwd that I'd
like to see commited or rejected as I'm starting to feel no one cares
about them and it's becoming a pain to maintain my own patched pool
version. After that I'd be willing to implement the transition to the
private lock idiom.

Sandy McArthur

"Government big enough to supply everything you
need is big enough to take everything you have ...
The course of history shows that as a government
grows, liberty decreases." -- Thomas Jefferson

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to