DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35882>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35882 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-30 04:39 ------- I like the idea of introducing a default abstract factory. The code provided by Ken is very useful, but there are some issues that IMO make including it in the JXPath distribution a little premature. 1. JXPath does not currently require JDK 1.5. Do we want to introduce that dependency at this point? 2. The factory does not handle either collections or indexed properties. 3. I believe this factory will sometimes generate NullPointerException. 4. I think if we were to bundle an implementation of AbstractFactory with JXPath, it should handle all supported object models, including DOM, JDOM, DynaBeans, maps etc. To summarize, I think we should let this one simmer till we have a more comprehensive implementation. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
