+1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called collections-functors).
Rational: I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under represented (in java) and non-standardised. I would like to see functors (sandbox) integrated and have a common interface set (and would like to help with such an undertaking). In addition to reducing the size of collections developers would, IMO, like to be able to use functors separately from collections. Tim. PS I'm new to this open-source community stuff so apologies for any mistakes/inappropriate actions (such as voting on this change). -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 November 2005 01:13 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors Reissued ballot paper as I can't use Ctrl+C... ----------------------- [ ] +1 I support creating [collection-functors] [ ] +0 It's OK [ ] -0 If you must [ ] -1 I don't support this because.... ----------------------- Stephen Stephen Colebourne wrote: > The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper > component, [collection-functors]. This component will be created > directly in commons proper, not the sandbox as it contains code > previously released. The primary motivations are to reduce to amount of > code held within [collections] itself (and thus the jar size), to allow > the functor part to grow and to allow independent release cycles. > > The new component will use the same package name as at present - > o.a.commons.collections.functors, and will produce a jar with the name > commons-collection-functors.jar. This new component will be at the top > level as far as maven and other tools are concerned. > > Please note that this is unrelated to the [functor] component in the > sandbox. > > ----------------------- > [ ] +1 I support creating [collection-functors] > [ ] +0 It's OK > [ ] +1 If you must > [ ] -1 I don't support this because.... > ----------------------- > > Voting open for 72 hours. > > Stephen > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
