On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 03:19 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: > On 11.12.2005, at 03:14, Simon Kitching wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: > >> As some projects are not really happy with the JCL > >> dependency it would be nice to have a simple and > >> small mock jar ...just to justify the dependency. > >> > >> Any objections to add this to the JCL codebase > >> and build system? ...or should that be hosted > >> somewhere else? > > > > What exactly do you mean by "mock jar", and how does this "justify the > > dependency"? > > Basically all it holds is the Log interface and > the LogFactory providing an Log implementation > that is doing nothing.
The existing jar already provides NoOpLog.jar. Providing a commons-logging.properties file, or setting the appropriate system property, ensures that no-op logging is used (the default is SimpleLog that just writes to stdout). Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
