On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I also said on the PMC list, I am not particularly interested in > development on feedparser, though I am willing to apply patches (if they are > complete with testcases). <snip/>
Thanks for stepping forward Martin, I have no background about any PMC thread, but I doubt thats what we are looking for. While I very much appreciate your intent, if we are going to sustain feedparser in proper, IMO, we really need someone to go beyond routine patches, for starters we need a RM for 1.0. -Rahul > Assuming dormant means you can still commit to it (else archive would have > been a better name probably), we can move it there and still apply patches > if eg Andrea Alberto comes up with something. If feedparsers matures we can > always move it back (with an appropiate vote of course). > > So willing to monitor feedparser stuff. > > Mvgr, > Martin > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote > > back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this > > component toward a release. > > > > I am happy to help getting the site fixed (seems we just need to add > > it to the nav, as http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/ is > > there) and with build-related issues; but I have neither the time nor > > expertise to do much else. > > > > If we can get one knowledgeable and interested committer to step up > > and a few volunteers, we can resuscitate; otherwise we should think > > about moving it to dormant. > > > > Any volunteers? > > > > Phil <snap/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
