On 1/17/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > Rahul Akolkar wrote on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:03 AM: > > > Based on Martin's (mvdb) veto against the recent promotion vote for > > Commons SCXML, it is obvious that lack of Commons' developers' > > interest (other than mine) for this component bothered some of us. > > As you also pointged out in your other mail, the use cases for SCXML are > difficult and people will only start to use it, if they grasp the theoretical > concept. <snip/>
I'm partly to blame as well for not having simpler usecases out there. BZ 38274 filed by Tim will hopefully address some of that by the time it is resolved. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
