You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...
paul
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to
join the W3C, but
we're currently not a Member organization.
<snap/>
FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.
If we stare at the W3C member list ...
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
... we see members such as:
* OASIS
* Mozilla
and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.
So, a couple of questions:
* Anyone else has any views on this?
* What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
