DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-20 20:19 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > So if you didn't need to change these variables, all you really needed was a > getter method. Daniel, maybe that would be a better solution? I don't > imagine > you're too comfortable with exposing stuff that begins and ends with > underscores? Since the underlying SocketClient stream members are already protected, I couldn't see how making the FTP reader wrappers protected would be dangerous. Until now, there hadn't been a need to expose that bit outside of the package. As far as the underscores go, I was just trying to remain consistent with the variable naming convention originally used in that code. For better or for worse, protected members were distinguished by leading and trailing underscores. At any rate, I don't have any strong feelings about the matter. In general, if someone using the library needs to specialize its behavior through inheritance, I figure it's evidence the need should be accommodated as long as there isn't some other way of meeting the need (e.g., aggregation). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
