On 3/6/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > >>> I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will
> > >> never see a vfs release :-(
> > >>
> > > Is there something that stops a VFS 1.0 with the rest of
> > > the providers (without these three)? Sure, it makes the 1.0 less than
> > > what we'd like it to be, but still probably better than waiting for
> > > slide (or some other foo release).
> > >
> > I can leave slide out, no problem, but compress is hard as the we loose
> > bzip2 and tar support.
> >
> <snip/>
>
> I understand. If we must have those, then VFS needs to adopt the five
> classes it needs:
>
> CBZip2{Input,Output}Stream, BZip2Constants, Tar{Entry,InputStream}
>
> Leave them package scoped, switch to compress when its released? I
> realize you'd rather not maintain those classes, but seems like this
> is the option that holds the most promise ATM.What would be the work involved in getting compress released? Any idea? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
