I'd prefer we didn't NOFIX any issues. Leaving them as NEW keeps their real status and shows noone is yet working on things.
On 4/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In making Latka dormant, should we be doing anything about the 15 > > issues open for Latka in Bugzilla; > <snip/> > > Over in Taglibs, when it became clear that some weren't going to see > any further development (soon), we WONTFIX'ed existing tickets -- a > quick search got me these examples: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22587 > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22895 > > Commons dormancy isn't quite the same, but maybe for the specific case > of [latka] a similar approach is justified. > > > > and should we be doing anything > > about the jakarta.apache.org/commons/latka/ website? > > > <snap/> > > I republished at the /sandbox/ URL, and meant to bring this up then. > Maybe we should let it 404, unless someone -1s. In any case, the > Commons website now points to the /sandbox/ URL. > > -Rahul > > > > Hen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
