The problem with this is that it counts against our open bug statistics.
Or is that not a measure we care about?
Stephen
Dion Gillard wrote:
I'd prefer we didn't NOFIX any issues. Leaving them as NEW keeps their real
status and shows noone is yet working on things.
On 4/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/17/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In making Latka dormant, should we be doing anything about the 15
issues open for Latka in Bugzilla;
<snip/>
Over in Taglibs, when it became clear that some weren't going to see
any further development (soon), we WONTFIX'ed existing tickets -- a
quick search got me these examples:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22587
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22895
Commons dormancy isn't quite the same, but maybe for the specific case
of [latka] a similar approach is justified.
and should we be doing anything
about the jakarta.apache.org/commons/latka/ website?
<snap/>
I republished at the /sandbox/ URL, and meant to bring this up then.
Maybe we should let it 404, unless someone -1s. In any case, the
Commons website now points to the /sandbox/ URL.
-Rahul
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
