Any ideas why there are unescape(String);String and unescape(Writer, String) implementations in Entities - independently implemented? They look like clones of each other - just one has nicer variable names.
Seems to me that: a) One should call the other. b) One could be deleted (given that Entities isn't public). In the latter case, there are two users of the methods: unescapeHtml calls the Writer,String and unescapeXml calls the String; so we would delete one and make the two unescapeXxx methods call the same method. Same applies for the escape() variants. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
