On 4/28/06, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also find JHCHTTPCORE absolutely horrible. I chose this id as I thought it would be the most "politically correct" one. I would very much rather prefer HTTPCORE or JHTTPCORE. Do you envisage a particular Jira id naming convention for Jakarta projects? At this point it is still not too late for us to scrap the project and start over with a different (better) project id.
I don't think it's important to have a scheme - it's just a project id that is used in such a way that users are aware of it. HCO, HTCO, JHTC. Doesn't matter and I agree with the Atlassian advice on it being a 3 or 4 letter code. So: LANG IO COLL CODX (though tempting to go with 5 letters when it fits, CODEC etc) ATTR BEAN etc. Dunno if that matches with the infra@ view. Having something with 11 letters is a pain in the arse given that the only time I ever find myself using the id is: a) to discuss something outside of Jira and b) to enter into the find box in the top right. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
