2006/7/14, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigermann <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Excatly! That's just what I was proposing in my last email!
>
>
> 2006/7/13, Henri Yandell <flamefew <at> gmail.com>:
> > Is the aim to have a 1.2 release of transaction at some point?
Yes, I would like to see a 1.2 release as well. There are enough fixes and
enhancements that qualify for a new release.
What's the actual release process (code freeze, etc.)?
Feature freeze for 1.2 is exactly now ;)
More info can be found here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/release.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html
I'd go for a release candidate right now, skipping betas. Opinions?
RELEASE-NOTES.txt talks about 1.1.1 while we now will probably name it 1.2 btw.
Oh, right. Will fix this.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
