Henri Yandell wrote:
On 7/23/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have reworked the VariableFormatter class along the lines that I
was thinking. I have committed it as StrSubstitutor so it doesn't
clash for the moment and so it can be easiy reviewed.
This version does not have a separate parser class, but still
supports escaping, and matchers for prefix/suffix (which can now be
set by users). The new class should perform better as a result.
I have removed the edge cases wrt resolving Objects, as they were
rather ill-defined.
Otherwise, the basic functionality it supported, and the test case
is slightly enlarged. I still want to break out the resolver as a
public abstract class before release.
Opinions
Oliver, Gary, Tom?
Looking to get Lang 2.2 moving out the door and this is the only blocker.
Hen
+1 for the name StrSubstitutor.
Well, I guess I have no chance to convince you to get back to Object as
result type for the resolver interface? Hm, for [configuration] I can
probably live with this, but it may cause unnecessary conversions.
I don't want to block the release.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
