Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 9/6/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 9/5/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip/> >> > >> > I'm happy for the checkstyle report/config to be fixed post 1.1 >> > release. >> > >> I don't see this as showstopper either - as stated above, I am +1 with >> release as is and understand Rahu's reservation about changes after RC >> tag and vote. >> > <snap/> > > Thanks Dion, Phil for clarifying. > > As a reminder, this vote closes in half a day. > > -Rahul > > >> Phil >>
Site: - site/index.html: the menu has as second item a reference to javadoc-1.0, which should be now 1.1 (and is a dead-link anyway) - site/index.html: the link in the menu to the examples should better point to the viewcvs.cgi version (see links on site/cvs-usage.html for "subversion viewer") - site/index.html: "Releases" section references 1.0 only - site/index.html: typo "compatibile" - site/releases.html: references 1.0 only - site/downloads.html: references 1.0 only (you might have to add the version to versions section of the project.xml) - site/javadoc.html: The output shows two invalid javadoc links Files: - the *.tar.gz files show following message unpacking it: "tar: A lone zero block at xxxx" (Linux) Bascially I am +1 to a release, but the site docs should at least be up-to-date for 1.1 at the relevant places. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
