On 9/6/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/>
Site: - site/index.html: the menu has as second item a reference to javadoc-1.0, which should be now 1.1 (and is a dead-link anyway) - site/index.html: the link in the menu to the examples should better point to the viewcvs.cgi version (see links on site/cvs-usage.html for "subversion viewer") - site/index.html: "Releases" section references 1.0 only - site/index.html: typo "compatibile" - site/releases.html: references 1.0 only - site/downloads.html: references 1.0 only (you might have to add the version to versions section of the project.xml) - site/javadoc.html: The output shows two invalid javadoc links
<snap/> Thanks for the detailed feedback, I had planned to update the 1.1 release bits on the site as part of cutting the release. As a procedural question, I wasn't sure whether a site should talk about the next release before that vote has actually passed. I've corrected the typo and changed examples to the viewcvs link. Thanks!
Files: - the *.tar.gz files show following message unpacking it: "tar: A lone zero block at xxxx" (Linux)
<snip/> Seems this ant issue has the details: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28776 Did that cause any other problems in the actual untarring? -Rahul
Bascially I am +1 to a release, but the site docs should at least be up-to-date for 1.1 at the relevant places. - Jörg
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
