On 2/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Might have to stop the vote anyway as it looks like the refactoring to
Entities.java undid an optimisation issue.
On 2/1/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correction: Tests did *not* run:
> Testcase: testLang312(org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest):
> FAILED
> It's the part of the fixture that tests the JDK ... maybe this should not be
> asserted and better be replaced by a simple sysout? In the end you cannot
> know what was changed/fixed by Sun in which JDK version (and if the
> assumption is valid for other JDKs) and it does not make sense to rely our
> tests on such a behavior.
How depressing. Yeah I think the best thing to do here is to test and
then print a WARNING rather than having JUnit fail.
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Rebuild from the src package with Sun JDK 5 under Linux.
> >
> > Minor: I understand that the proposal is a historical document, but it
> > claims that c-lang is build on top of JDK 1.2 ... that might be confusing.
What do people think - update PROPOSALs or delete them?
Neither - leave it unchanged. It is historical and I think it is
obvious it is, many (most?) components have them and I've never seen
it raised as a cause for confusion.
Niall
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
