I don't see a problem in doing the last 2 years, which kind of gives us a nice clean "committer" base and if we miss people, they simply need to ask for it. Another options is just copy & pasting the jakarta committers block from asf-authorization, that way you know everyone who has access, still has access..
Mvgr, Martin Henri Yandell wrote: > On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 6/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On 6/28/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > On 6/27/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > Personally, my vote would be to say: >> > > > > >> > > > > commons=committers >> > > > >> > > > You mean all apache committers? I agree that we should continue >> the >> > > > tradition of granting commons karma to any committer who asks >> for it. >> > > > I don't know much about how this works in svn or what the risk / >> > > > downside of auto-granting commons karma to new committers would be, >> > > > but I agree with the principle that any ASF committer should be >> > > > welcome here. >> > > > >> > > > There are also a lot of current commons committers missing from the >> > > > list above. My preference would be to have them remain commons >> > > > committers if that is not too hard to do. In any case, any current >> > > > commons committer who wants karma should get it. >> > > >> > > I agree - please lets not remove commit privledge from anyone who >> > > currently has it in Commons. >> > >> > Presuming no one recognizes the social genius of my first proposal, >> > then I recommend that we make the list of committers be anyone who has >> > committed in the last 2 years. >> >> Why have you gone from proposing to add any remaining ASF Commiters >> that don't currently have access to now removing access from anyone >> who hasn't committed in the last two years? This seems a bit random in >> principle to me to take one position to open things up one minute and >> then another to make it more restrictive the next. > > Just looking for something simple. > >> I also dislike arbitrary limits - you choose 2 years - maybe someone >> else will prefer 1 year and so on. I still think anyone that currently >> has access should keep it and not loose their commit access to >> Commons. > > Pondered that one. We could keep the commons commit list as the > jakarta group. Seemed a bit odd though. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
