Same here. I think 2 years is reasonable. They can ask to get commit
rights back at any time.
Henry, care to compile the list? Didn't you have some scripts for
that already? :)
cheers
--
Torsten
On 28.06.2007, at 10:14, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I don't see a problem in doing the last 2 years, which kind of
gives us a nice clean "committer"
base and if we miss people, they simply need to ask for it.
Another options is just copy & pasting the jakarta committers block
from asf-authorization, that way
you know everyone who has access, still has access..
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, my vote would be to say:
commons=committers
You mean all apache committers? I agree that we should continue
the
tradition of granting commons karma to any committer who asks
for it.
I don't know much about how this works in svn or what the risk /
downside of auto-granting commons karma to new committers
would be,
but I agree with the principle that any ASF committer should be
welcome here.
There are also a lot of current commons committers missing
from the
list above. My preference would be to have them remain commons
committers if that is not too hard to do. In any case, any
current
commons committer who wants karma should get it.
I agree - please lets not remove commit privledge from anyone who
currently has it in Commons.
Presuming no one recognizes the social genius of my first proposal,
then I recommend that we make the list of committers be anyone
who has
committed in the last 2 years.
Why have you gone from proposing to add any remaining ASF Commiters
that don't currently have access to now removing access from anyone
who hasn't committed in the last two years? This seems a bit
random in
principle to me to take one position to open things up one minute
and
then another to make it more restrictive the next.
Just looking for something simple.
I also dislike arbitrary limits - you choose 2 years - maybe someone
else will prefer 1 year and so on. I still think anyone that
currently
has access should keep it and not loose their commit access to
Commons.
Pondered that one. We could keep the commons commit list as the
jakarta group. Seemed a bit odd though.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
