Re: Need an Axiom relase

[Eran Chinthaka]

Hi, The change Ruchith has done is significant to DOOM only. DOOM is not within AXIOM and this change has affected only OM apis. AFAIK, the internals of OM has changed minimally, because Ruchith didn't *enforce*the constraint to llom. So I don't think we have a stability issue in axiom. We've been using Axiom for about two years, and this is not the end of axiom. So I'd like to see axiom 1.0, before Axis2 0.95. Deepal, are you looking after this release also or you need any help ? -- Chinthaka Ruchith Fernando wrote: Hi All, Yep the change I did was pretty significant and we are still not enforcing any constraint on adding elements from 'incompatible' factories in llom ... (doom is done). Therefore I think we should go for a 0.95 release rather than a 1.0. Thanks, Ruchith On 3/8/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 18:18 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote: Hi, AFAIK ruchith did the change and commited the stuff. But should we go for a .9x something before 1.0 since our release canditate notion is 0.9x style release numbers ? We have 0.94 so far .. if its feature complete then I'm happy to say call it 1.0 (like we did with XmlSchema) rather than wait pointlessly. Anyway if Ruchith committed a significant change maybe we should call it 0.95 and then do a 1.0 soon after we are happy everything's stable. Sanjiva.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature