Hi Chinthaka ; I think its better either if you or Ajith is doing the release :)
yes , I really like do the Axis2 release with Axiom 1.0 Eran Chinthaka wrote: > Hi, > > The change Ruchith has done is significant to DOOM only. DOOM is not > within AXIOM and this change has affected only OM apis. AFAIK, the > internals of OM has changed minimally, because Ruchith didn't > *enforce*the constraint to llom. > > So I don't think we have a stability issue in axiom. We've been using > Axiom for about two years, and this is not the end of axiom. > > So I'd like to see axiom 1.0, before Axis2 0.95. > > Deepal, are you looking after this release also or you need any help ? > > -- Chinthaka > > Ruchith Fernando wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>Yep the change I did was pretty significant and we are still not >>enforcing any constraint on adding elements from 'incompatible' >>factories in llom ... (doom is done). Therefore I think we should go >>for a 0.95 release rather than a 1.0. >> >>Thanks, >>Ruchith >> >>On 3/8/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 18:18 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>>AFAIK ruchith did the change and commited the stuff. But should we go >>>>for a .9x something before 1.0 since our release canditate notion is >>>>0.9x style release numbers ? >>>> >>>> >>>We have 0.94 so far .. if its feature complete then I'm happy to say >>>call it 1.0 (like we did with XmlSchema) rather than wait pointlessly. >>> >>>Anyway if Ruchith committed a significant change maybe we should call it >>>0.95 and then do a 1.0 soon after we are happy everything's stable. >>> >>>Sanjiva. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ ~Future is Open~
