+1 for 1.0.1. Lawrence Mandel
"Ajith Ranabahu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/28/2006 12:37 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: [Vote]New release of XMLSchema Hi, Cool, I'm ok with the version number 1.0.1 (and frankly I'm thinking that Jeremy has a point and 1.0.1 would be a better number than 1.1) Ajith On 3/27/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm interested in the reasoning about using 1.1 for small bugfix > release (including extra docs). I think v1.0.1 would be more fitting. > IMHO a v2 would likely include very significant new function or maybe > even a rearchitecture. v1.1 should contain new function and v1.0.1 > would include bug fixes, doc updates etc. Users of v1.0 not requiring > new function would likely upgrade to v1.0.x quite readily in the > knowledge that only bugs have been fixed and no new (potentially > disruptive) functional changes have been made. Most projects in my > experience do it like this ... eg Axis > > So I'm +1 for a release. But maybe call it v1.0.1. > > Thx, > Jeremy > > On 3/27/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 15:07 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > I am travelling a lot this week, but I can help do the release this > > > weekend. > > > - Dan > > > > > > Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just commited some documentation (still at the maven 1 structure > > > > though) and a patched up build script that generates binary and source > > > > distributions for the XMLSchema. > > > > Since the last XMLSchema release hardly had any documentation and due > > > > to the fixing of several crucial bugs (such as errorneous > > > > serialization of the schema in JDK 1.5) I propose > > > > we do a commons XMLSchema 1.1 release. > > > > > > > > here is my +1 for the XMLSchema 1.1 release. > > > > -- > > > > Ajith Ranabahu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Ajith Ranabahu
