On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 02:32 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > Thanks for the response Sanjiva. The development model is not really > frustrating but, like I said, is a bit concerning as there is no > management of a project that Woden is dependent on. I can see how this
The only way to provide management is for you to step up to doing more work for them :-). > model can be useful for these common projects as they seem to be developed > on an even more volunteer (as you have time or find bugs) basis. Being > relatively new at this I'll play along for now and see how things go. Cool. Please don't translate "it ain't managed" to "its a mess" .. just send notes to the appropriate -dev list when you want something and it can/man happen. If you *really* want something to happen, then at least in WS land you have the authority to just do it (like Nike). > As far as what's new in the release, I'd like to see a high level overview > of what's changed in the release in the post that calls for the vote. This > will allow those of us that haven't been following that closely to at > least get an idea of the big ticket items in a release and a better > understanding of why the project should be released at this time. We can > then follow up on issues we're really concerned about in Jira. +1; this is a fair request! Sanjiva.
