Dan, sorry, this is slightly off topic, but I believe all distributions have to contain the Apache license in full [1]. I couldn't see one in XmlSchema 1.0.1 [2] ... would you be able to fix it?
[1] http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html [2] http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1_0_1/XmlSchema-1.0.1.jar Thanks, Jeremy On 4/10/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I already pushed out jars/sources but I supposed can overwrite > them. Thoughts? Any care if I just wrap this into 1.0.1? > - Dan > > Srinath Perera wrote: > > >Dan why didn't we fix the bug and call it 1.0.1. Since you have not > >announce 1.0.1, why we should call it 1.0.2? > >Srinath > > > >On 4/9/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi everyone, > >> > >>I know I haven't announced the 1.0.1 release, but I would like to skip > >>the announcement and proceed with a 1.0.2 release. I found a critical > >>bug where with WSDLs such as the salesforce.com one, XmlSchema wasn't > >>reading in schemas into the correct target namespace. The problem arises > >>because it would actually recurse up to the <wsdl> element, read in the > >>target namespace and set the current XmlSchema for that target namespace > >>(in addition to its own target namespace). Suffice to say, this would > >>cause XmlSchema to not function correctly with a lot of WSDLs (like > >>salesforce.com). I would like to see this remedied in a release ASAP. > >> > >>So throw in your -1, 0, or +1! > >> > >>- Dan > >> > >>-- > >>Dan Diephouse > >>(616) 971-2053 > >>Envoi Solutions LLC > >>http://netzooid.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >============================ > >Srinath Perera: > > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > > > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > (616) 971-2053 > Envoi Solutions LLC > http://netzooid.com > >
