Hi Jeremy,
Yeah I can do that. Maybe this is a good reason for me to completely
redo the 1.0.1 release with the critical fix.
- Dan
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Dan, sorry, this is slightly off topic, but I believe all
distributions have to contain the Apache license in full [1]. I
couldn't see one in XmlSchema 1.0.1 [2] ... would you be able to fix
it?
[1] http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1_0_1/XmlSchema-1.0.1.jar
Thanks,
Jeremy
On 4/10/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I already pushed out jars/sources but I supposed can overwrite
them. Thoughts? Any care if I just wrap this into 1.0.1?
- Dan
Srinath Perera wrote:
Dan why didn't we fix the bug and call it 1.0.1. Since you have not
announce 1.0.1, why we should call it 1.0.2?
Srinath
On 4/9/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I haven't announced the 1.0.1 release, but I would like to skip
the announcement and proceed with a 1.0.2 release. I found a critical
bug where with WSDLs such as the salesforce.com one, XmlSchema wasn't
reading in schemas into the correct target namespace. The problem arises
because it would actually recurse up to the <wsdl> element, read in the
target namespace and set the current XmlSchema for that target namespace
(in addition to its own target namespace). Suffice to say, this would
cause XmlSchema to not function correctly with a lot of WSDLs (like
salesforce.com). I would like to see this remedied in a release ASAP.
So throw in your -1, 0, or +1!
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
--
============================
Srinath Perera:
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
