Hi Dennis, How about changing the name of the OMDataSource to something else.. After looking in to the recent discussions it seems that the name is the reason for lot of confusion... OMDataSource sounds like it implements the javax.activation.DataSource. (I hope it's not.. Frankly I haven't had a look at the source)
Just a small suggestion from me... :) ~Thilina On 4/22/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > I re-revert the changes and now you should see them back again in Axiom > and Axis2. If there are missing parts, please add them. > > I also +1 to the idea of OMDataSource. > > I hope you and all can understand that, I revert your changes not > because of a problem with the technical content or anything, but because > there was no response from you for question on that and due to RC. So > hope this is settled now. > > And I'd like to have a RC3, ASAP, preferably tomorrow, with these > changes. What do you all think about it ? > > -- Chinthaka > > Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > If the changes *are* going to make it into Axiom I'll finish up my Axis2 > > JiBX code changes tomorrow. Everything was working prior to the Axiom > > rollback, with only the unit tests still incomplete. > > > > I apologize for creating this mess through not subscribing to the proper > > email list and properly tracking the state of the project, and for > > wasting everyone's time as a result of my ignorance. I find it > > personally somewhat ironic that I was one of the people who voted in > > favor of moving Axiom out of the Axis2 tree in the first place, but then > > didn't follow up on the change myself. I'll work at being a better > > Apache team member in the future. > > > > - Dennis > > > > -- "May the SourcE be with u" http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina
