+1 .. plus, IMO OMNamespace.getName() is in fact the right name .. the namespace URI is called the namespace name isn't it??
namespaceURI() was/is the right name when you ask someone else (like an element) for its NSURI, but when you're talking to the OMNamespace node what we have now seems ok to me. Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 02:08 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > We have to stop sometime...am sure if we look a bit more, we will find > a bunch of more changes. anyway that is my 2 cents. > > -- dims > > On 4/26/06, Ruchith Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm... since this is an interface change ... isn't it better to do it > > before 1.0 ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ruchith > > > > On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's leave it alone for now..let's collect these suggestions > > > somewhere and use that later. > > > > > > thanks, > > > dims > > > > > > On 4/26/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can we do this now before Axiom 1.0 and Axis2 1.0 ? > > > > > > > > I'd like to have getURI rather than getNamespaceURI as I feel > > > > OMNamespace.getURI is appropriate over OMNamespace.getNamespaceURI. > > > > > > > > -- Chinthaka > > > > > > > > Glen Daniels wrote: > > > > > Looking at OMNamespace... > > > > > > > > > > Um... "getName()"?? > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't that be getNamespaceURI() like in pretty much every other > > > > > API? > > > > > > > > > > Can we refactor this before the next release please? > > > > > > > > > > --Glen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
