+1 not to change at this point :) Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Yes please. Let's leave it alone. > >-- dims > >On 4/27/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Unfortunately, now I have to twist this a bit. >> >>I tried to do this with Sandesha2, Policy and Axis2 in the project, in >>addition to Axiom. I found that this will change 242 places in 83 files. >>Doing this kind of non-critical refactoring is not that good, at least >>in the current stage. >> >>Considering the amount of work we have and the criticality of this >>compared others shall we leave this as it is, please ? A humble request >>from a poor developer :). >> >>Anyway, its just another name change. Axis2 and Axiom will function very >>well with or without that change. >> >>-- Chinthaka >> >>Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:37 -0400, Glen Daniels wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Personally, I agree with Ruchith and think that interface renames like >>>>this should happen before 1.0. >>>> >>>> >>>I'm not going to get in the way with this change .. but if we are going >>>to change it it must be done now and not later! >>> >>>So, +1 for whatever appears to be the winning name ;-). >>> >>>Sanjiva. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ ~Future is Open~
