Surely the javadocs jar is sufficient for the IDE to displaying hover-over javadoc - it is for Eclipse.
Also, users who are concerned about source contamination issues expect bin distros to not contain source. I'm also -1 for shipping source in the bin dist (as you probably gathered). Cheers, Jeremy On 5/2/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. Its not the source for building (there is no ant build.xml), its a source jar for IDEs - so things like Javadocs show you up when you hover over XmlSchemaCollection for example. - Dan Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Hi Dan, is there any reason for including the source within the bin > distribution? I'd prefer it if the bin contained the binaries only and > leave it to the src dist to contain the source. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > On 4/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I published the 1.0.2 release of XmlSchema. You can check it out here. I >> kept a source jar bundled in the binary distro as a lot of people like >> that for their IDEs. One thing I just noticed is that the javadocs are >> jar'd. I'll fix that next time around if thats ok with everyone. >> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1_0_2/ >> http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1.0.2/ >> >> >> Speak up if you have any major issues. I'll do a real announcement >> tomorrow morning. >> Cheers, >> - Dan >> >> -- >> Dan Diephouse >> Envoi Solutions >> http://envoisolutions.com >> http://netzooid.com/blog >> >> -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog
