OK, I will rework it.
- Dan
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Surely the javadocs jar is sufficient for the IDE to displaying
hover-over javadoc - it is for Eclipse.
Also, users who are concerned about source contamination issues expect
bin distros to not contain source.
I'm also -1 for shipping source in the bin dist (as you probably
gathered).
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 5/2/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. Its not the source for building (there is no ant build.xml), its a
source jar for IDEs - so things like Javadocs show you up when you hover
over XmlSchemaCollection for example.
- Dan
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi Dan, is there any reason for including the source within the bin
> distribution? I'd prefer it if the bin contained the binaries only and
> leave it to the src dist to contain the source.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> On 4/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I published the 1.0.2 release of XmlSchema. You can check it out
here. I
>> kept a source jar bundled in the binary distro as a lot of people
like
>> that for their IDEs. One thing I just noticed is that the javadocs
are
>> jar'd. I'll fix that next time around if thats ok with everyone.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1_0_2/
>>
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/XmlSchema/1.0.2/
>>
>>
>> Speak up if you have any major issues. I'll do a real announcement
>> tomorrow morning.
>> Cheers,
>> - Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Diephouse
>> Envoi Solutions
>> http://envoisolutions.com
>> http://netzooid.com/blog
>>
>>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
