[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-20?page=comments#action_12378615 ]
Paul Nolan commented on WSCOMMONS-20: ------------------------------------- Yes I agree. I think All and ExactlyOne make sense. Who do you want to do this work? > Proposal to rename composite assertions > --------------------------------------- > > Key: WSCOMMONS-20 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-20 > Project: WS-Commons > Type: Improvement > Components: Policy > Reporter: Paul Nolan > > ws-policy defines two elements called All and ExactlyOne. These have been > modelled in Neethi with two objects called AndCompositeAssertion and > XorCompositeAssertion. These object names would perhaps be more accurate if > they were named in alignment with the specification. The > XorCompositeAssertion also gives the misleading impression that it behaves > like an exclusive OR which is only true when it has two child elements.In the > case with more than two child elements ExactlyOne behaves quite differently > from exclusive OR. > I would like to propose we change these object names. They can either be > "All" and "ExactlyOne" or "AllOperator" and "ExactlyOneOperator" or > "AllCompositeAssertion" and "ExactlyOneCompositeAssertion". How should we > proceed? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
