I'll do it by tomorrow
Best,
Sanka
On 5/9/06, Paul Nolan (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-20?page=comments#action_12378615
]
Paul Nolan commented on WSCOMMONS-20:
-------------------------------------
Yes I agree. I think All and ExactlyOne make sense. Who do you want to do this
work?
> Proposal to rename composite assertions
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: WSCOMMONS-20
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSCOMMONS-20
> Project: WS-Commons
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Policy
> Reporter: Paul Nolan
>
> ws-policy defines two elements called All and ExactlyOne. These have been
modelled in Neethi with two objects called AndCompositeAssertion and
XorCompositeAssertion. These object names would perhaps be more accurate if they
were named in alignment with the specification. The XorCompositeAssertion also
gives the misleading impression that it behaves like an exclusive OR which is only
true when it has two child elements.In the case with more than two child elements
ExactlyOne behaves quite differently from exclusive OR.
> I would like to propose we change these object names. They can either be "All" and "ExactlyOne" or
"AllOperator" and "ExactlyOneOperator" or "AllCompositeAssertion" and "ExactlyOneCompositeAssertion".
How should we proceed?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
