Hi, Glen Daniels wrote: > I'm not worried about the DOM dependency either. Schema processing is > typically (not always, but usually) going to be a design time thing > where squeaking every bit of performance out isn't as important.
Its not about performance I'm talking here. Think of a situation where you have the whole WSDL in an OM tree. Do you want to get the schema element from it, build DOM and pump it to XmlSchema. I hope you won't say yes, if you care at least a lil bit about elegance. This is the exact thing Oshani is doing in her effort in integrating StAX support for Woden. > I *really* don't want to get into another whole "Yet Another XML Factory > Abstraction" thing unless we truly need it. And DOM is a pretty > convenient Since when you started to say DOM has a convenient API? I for one hates it. I can remember you were hating DOM apis a lot, during the first Axis2 f2f and was very much impressed with JDom API. > (and standard, as Ajith points out) API for walking around an > XML tree with lots of cross-references. Anyway, I'm ok to go ahead with DOOM as Sanjiva suggested. -- Chinthaka
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
