Hey Sanjiva:
However, the DOOM approach has an advantage- you get a DOM tree for the
DOM-coolaids and you get an AXIOM tree for the OM-coolaids. See, you can
in fact satisfy them all ;-).
Well, sort of. :) Isn't DOOM a totally separate OM implementation? So
we can't just stream in a "standard" OM from somewhere (as a part of
normal message processing, let's say) and then use DOOM without
converting, right? And if you need to convert you have a performance
problem.
What might be nice is a DOM implementation that truly sits "on top" of
OM, so you could do:
OMElement om;
...
Element dom = DOMWrapper.getDOMElement(om);
Where we'd then have a "wrapper" DOM Element which just delegated calls
to its underlying OM implementation...
Isn't that what we originally talked about when designing OM?
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
