Eran Chinthaka wrote:

>Any action item on this? I can still see .project files in the svn.
>
>Do we wanna move that to a separate folder as Dennis suggested or wanna
>completely remove them?
>  
>
+1 to completely remove IDE related files.

>-- Chinthaka
>
>Afkham Azeez wrote:
>  
>
>>IMHO the codebase is going to get cluttered with so may IDE specific files
>>of different IDEs if users who use several IDEs (IDEA, JBuilder, JDeveloper
>>etc, etc.) all start committing their IDE specific files. So as a general
>>practice, it is better not to commit IDE specific files.
>>
>>Azeez
>>
>>On 8/18/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Eran Chintaka wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>1. There are lot of non-eclipse users who are checking out/in code (FYI
>>>>: most of the axiom devs are *not* using eclipse). So why bother we
>>>>checking out eclipse junk :)
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Are you telling me, it disturbs you to have two additional files and a
>>>folder, which are most possibly even hidden because of the .foo
>>>convention?
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>2. As Ajith also had already mentioned, maven helps you to generate the
>>>>relevant IDE specific stuff.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>It does. However, the output of the plugins is far from acceptable. In
>>>particular, the output folders will rarely match.
>>>
>>>Besides, there's more to it: Compiler settings (which should obviously
>>>match those from the pom), formatting guidelines, and the like. These
>>>aren't controlled by any plugin.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>3. Some one can declare a variable in Eclipse, pointing to his folder
>>>>and can accidentally commit that in to svn.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>The files I have committed do not use any variables.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>4. If some one is having a customized version of .project and
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>.classpath
>>>      
>>>
>>>>files, they always gets conflicts, which is un-necessary, IMO.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>IMO, that's a question of discipline. And, if it actually happens:
>>>What prevents you from revoking or overwriting a commit?
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>5. None or most of the WS project do not have IDE specific committed so
>>>>far. Eg : Axis2, axiom, neethi, etc.,
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>JaxMe, XML-RPC, and ws-commons-util do. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>The point I am trying to make is that IDE specific files can be good
>>>for some people. If they proove to be disturbing the projects work,
>>>then I'd be the first to remove it. But so far I can only see a "we
>>>don't like it" and no "look at this example, it has really done harm".
>>>Which matches my personal experience with other projects.
>>>
>>>
>>>Jochen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
>>>once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce;
>>>murder, yes, but divorce, never.
>>>(Jack Benny)
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

n~ 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to