Hi All, I had a customized versions of .classpath and it seems te be giving a conflict to me. I also belive that IDE specific files should not be included in the SVN repo. So +1 for removing those.
Chamikara On 8/23/06, Afkham Azeez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Me too. +1 to NOT having any IDE specific files in the code repository. On 8/23/06, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eran Chinthaka wrote: > > >Any action item on this? I can still see .project files in the svn. > > > >Do we wanna move that to a separate folder as Dennis suggested or wanna > >completely remove them? > > > > > +1 to completely remove IDE related files. > > >-- Chinthaka > > > >Afkham Azeez wrote: > > > > > >>IMHO the codebase is going to get cluttered with so may IDE specific > files > >>of different IDEs if users who use several IDEs (IDEA, JBuilder, > JDeveloper > >>etc, etc.) all start committing their IDE specific files. So as a > general > >>practice, it is better not to commit IDE specific files. > >> > >>Azeez > >> > >>On 8/18/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Eran Chintaka wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>1. There are lot of non-eclipse users who are checking out/in code > (FYI > >>>>: most of the axiom devs are *not* using eclipse). So why bother we > >>>>checking out eclipse junk :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Are you telling me, it disturbs you to have two additional files and a > >>>folder, which are most possibly even hidden because of the .foo > >>>convention? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>2. As Ajith also had already mentioned, maven helps you to generate > the > >>>>relevant IDE specific stuff. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>It does. However, the output of the plugins is far from acceptable. In > >>>particular, the output folders will rarely match. > >>> > >>>Besides, there's more to it: Compiler settings (which should obviously > >>>match those from the pom), formatting guidelines, and the like. These > >>>aren't controlled by any plugin. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>3. Some one can declare a variable in Eclipse, pointing to his folder > >>>>and can accidentally commit that in to svn. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>The files I have committed do not use any variables. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>4. If some one is having a customized version of .project and > >>>> > >>>> > >>>.classpath > >>> > >>> > >>>>files, they always gets conflicts, which is un-necessary, IMO. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>IMO, that's a question of discipline. And, if it actually happens: > >>>What prevents you from revoking or overwriting a commit? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>5. None or most of the WS project do not have IDE specific committed > so > >>>>far. Eg : Axis2, axiom, neethi, etc., > >>>> > >>>> > >>>JaxMe, XML-RPC, and ws-commons-util do. :-) > >>> > >>> > >>>The point I am trying to make is that IDE specific files can be good > >>>for some people. If they proove to be disturbing the projects work, > >>>then I'd be the first to remove it. But so far I can only see a "we > >>>don't like it" and no "look at this example, it has really done harm". > >>>Which matches my personal experience with other projects. > >>> > >>> > >>>Jochen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not > >>>once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce; > >>>murder, yes, but divorce, never. > >>>(Jack Benny) > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > n~ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks Afkham Azeez
