Or lack of a vote :-). The vote may be proving that the commons-ws
community is so anemic that the PMC needs to push the reboot button.

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. Hopefully the PMC members will take a look at the VOTE
> happening on commons-dev@ when they get a minute off the axis-dev
> mailing list.
>
> -- dims
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Monday 03 November 2008 12:46:42 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> So, should all synapse and cxf folks have access to all these
>>> projects? What say you?
>>
>> No.   It's still a community and thus the normal meritocracy rules apply.
>>
>> That said, some of those projects may need a swift kick in the pants to get
>> them moving again and getting some fresh blood into them.   There are several
>> outstanding patches and requests and such that could warrant some votes on
>> some new people.    It shouldn't be hard for a CXF person or Axis2 persons or
>> anyone else to become a committer through the normal means.   Unfortunately,
>> that hasn't been working too well lately.   Getting the projects promoted a
>> level may help increase some awareness which may help as would looking at the
>> interested people and seeing if they do deserve committership or not.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> >> On Monday 03 November 2008 10:14:30 am Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> >>> Glen,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Was looking at
>>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Proposals/Axis2TLPProposal
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Any thoughts on why leave behind XmlSchema, Neethi, Axiom?
>>> >>
>>> >> Because they are used by several other projects that have nothing to do
>>> >> with Axis 2?
>>> >
>>> > Exactly.  I do NOT think (re: the other thread) that Axiom should be a
>>> > TLP, and I do think that all of these libraries make sense as "Web
>>> > Services" components with a shared committer-base working on them.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > --Glen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>

Reply via email to